Cases 31 - 40 of 2,256
(PS) Roots v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv01767
Defendant:
Josie Gastelo, Kline, R&R Workers and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Roots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown, et al. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., et al.
as 24-3789
Plaintiff:
MARLI BROWN and LACEY SMITH
Defendant:
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. and ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWA AFL-CIO
Marvin Brown et al v. Department of Water and Power et al
as 2:2024cv05152
Respondent:
Pandora Consulting Associates, LLC, City Attorney's Office, Does 1-100 and others
Petitioner:
Marvin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Langworthy v. Lev, et al.
as 24-3729
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
DEBRA LEV, Judge, Bellingham Municipal Court, DARLENE PETERSON, Judge, Bellingham Municipal Court, JASON SMITH, Owner, North County Defense and others
Brown v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-3671
Petitioner:
MARLON LORENZO BROWN
Respondent:
N. BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brown v. Flyman, et al.
as 24-3676
Plaintiff:
MARLON LORENZO BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL FLYMAN, EASY BAIL, LLC and AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY
Taylor v. Brown
as 24-3441
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
MARK D. BROWN
Kouyate et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03135
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michele Kielbasa, David Freifeld, Jarell Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Alona Jennings, Charles Haeussinger, Noah Meiner and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gardner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-3127
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, KATE BROWN, Governor of Oregon, C. Peters and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER GARDNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
