Cases 31 - 40 of 357
In re: Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Ins., et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 22-80116
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND, PETER STALEY and others
Petitioner:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., GILEAD HOLDINGS, LLC, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Madrid Tovar, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1588
Petitioner:
YANIRA ISABETH MADRID TOVAR and STEVEN ALEXIS MOLINA MADRID
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina v. American Recovery Service Incorporated
as 3:2022cv01332
Plaintiff:
Holiday Molina
Defendant:
American Recovery Service Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Elvis Molina
as 22-50161
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELVIS EDGARDO MOLINA
USA v. Elvis Molina
as 22-50162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELVIS EDGARDO MOLINA
Molina Morales v. Garland
as 22-964
Petitioner:
JOSE ADAN MOLINA MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina De Sandoval v. Garland
as 22-713
Petitioner:
VALERIA MOLINA DE SANDOVAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Cortez v. Garland
as 22-414
Petitioner:
MARVIN ALEXANDER MOLINA-CORTEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
