Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Robert Bass v. USDCSD
as 09-72917
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Respondent:
USDC, SAN DIEGO
Patricia Dotson v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01682
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dotson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Darryl Dotson v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 2:2009cv06115
Petitioner:
Darryl Dotson
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy Lee Dotson v. John Marshall
as 2:2009cv05743
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee Dotson
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Teresita Dotson
as 09-30149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERESITA DOTSON
Knox et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 4:2009cv00162
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar and C. L. Otter
Plaintiff:
Wendy Knox, Wendy Knox, Richard Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bass v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv02135
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Bass Inc. and Robert Curtis Bass
Defendant:
County of San Diego, State of California, San Diego Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Tristram Buckley v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02822
Plaintiff:
Tristram T Buckley
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile International AD & CO. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
Berman v. The VIP Tour Company et al
as 3:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jeff Berman and Jeff Berman
Defendant:
The VIP Tour Company, The VIP Tour Company, Mike Domek and others
Mediator:
Mark Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
