Cases 31 - 40 of 1,384
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-2098
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, [61] AC, JERRY BUTCHER, [61] AC and others
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
United States of America v. Scovotto
as 24-1996
Defendant:
ANTHONY FRANK SCOVOTTO, Franky Pisano, frankypisano93 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Frank et al v. Yardi Systems Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frank and Lakshmi Nagireddi
Defendant:
Yardi Systems, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Bell v. Hawx Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Frank Bell
Defendant:
Hawx Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Neal v. Kendall, et al.
as 24-1286
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III, Secretary of the Air Force, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, DAVID S. CRUIKSHANK and others
DePetro, et al. v. Minev, et al.
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
FRANK DEPETRO
Defendant:
MICHAEL MINEV, HDSP MEDICAL NURSING STAFF, DENNIS TAMBAN, Last name added by SAC, ECF No. 21 formerly known as Dennis and others
Flannery v. Snowflake Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01234
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L. Flannery
Defendant:
Snowflake Inc., Frank Slootman and Michael P. Scarpelli
Porras Atao, et al. v. Garland
as 24-926
Petitioner:
ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS ATAO and FRANK MAYTA PORRAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
