Cases 31 - 40 of 3,918
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1681
Petitioner:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Ayala Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1576
Petitioner:
KARLA ROCIO AYALA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chen, et al. v. Premier Financial Alliance, Inc., et al.
as 24-1484
Plaintiff:
BIYUN ZONG, DALTON CHEN, YOUXIANG EILEEN WANG and others
Defendant:
PREMIER FINANCIAL ALLIANCE, INC., a suspended California Corporation, or as may be organized under Georgia Law and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST
Gonzales-Fuentes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1450
Petitioner:
BREYNER GONZALES-FUENTES, SUCELY CORONADO, BREYNER GONZALEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner:
STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ejonga-Deogracias v. Sinclair, et al.
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
JOJO EJONGA-DEOGRACIAS
Defendant:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary, Department of Corrections, MICHAEL OBENLAND, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
United States of America v. Gonzalez-Loera
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERTO GONZALEZ-LOERA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-988
Petitioner:
CANDELARIA ANGELICA GONZALEZ, ESTRELLA ROSAMARINA PUAC GONZALEZ and LUNA J PUAC GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
