Cases 31 - 40 of 1,470
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
LaRocca v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2323
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAROCCA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHEL MOORE, Chief and others
Bledsoe v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-2198
Plaintiff:
DONNELL BLEDSOE
Defendant:
MARTINEZ, Sgt., LEATUGE, MICHELL and others
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Castello v. Quinstreet Pl, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michelle Castello
Defendant:
Quinstreet Pl, Inc. doing business as Amone
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Michele Vives et al v. Iervolino and Lady Bacardi Entertainment S.P.A. et al
as 2:2024cv02625
Petitioner:
Vives Michele
Respondent:
Iervolino & Lady Bacardi Entertainment S.P.A., Orion Releasing, LLC and Iervolino and Lady Bacardi Entertainment S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Roberts, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1949
Plaintiff:
JANE ELIZABETH ROBERTS, JON ALLEMAN, MICHELLE ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN SPOKANE, SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, INC. and others
Molina-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1919
Petitioner:
ROGER ADOLFO MOLINA-ESCOBAR, ELISA MORALES-ALVARADO, EMELY MICHELLE MOLINA-MORALES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
