Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16373
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Kravitz v. Sony Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv06325
Plaintiff: Peter Kravitz
Defendant: Sony Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation et al
as 5:2015mc80307
Plaintiff: Masimo Corporation
Defendant: Philips Electronics North America Corporation and Philips Medizin Systeme Boblingen GMBH
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Alfred H. Siegel v. Sony Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv03248
Plaintiff: Alfred H. Siegel
Defendant: Sony Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Ira Erwin, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 12-16780
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant: IRA CONNER ERWIN
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15930
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: MARIA MARSHALL, GERI MAXWELL, WAYNE MARSHALL and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Keena Dale, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16216
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Appellant: KEENA DALE
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15920
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant: CBC, INC.
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15916
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Appellant: ALEX MARTINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15917
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: MARGOT BRADLEY
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?