Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 458
Juarez-Santiago v. Garland
as 23-624
Petitioner: NAHU JUAREZ-SANTIAGO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Santiago v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-807
Petitioner: ALFONZO RAMIREZ-SANTIAGO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aquino Salazar v. Garland
as 23-553
Petitioner: SANTIAGO SALAZAR AQUINO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago Reyes v. Garland
as 22-1439
Petitioner: MARLENE ARALY SANTIAGO REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago-Mateo v. Garland
as 22-826
Petitioner: LUCIA SANTIAGO-MATEO, DIEGO KELVIN CARRILLO-SANTIAGO and ISABEL KARYME SANTIAGO-MATEO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bermudez Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1895
Petitioner: ALVARO BERMUDEZ CRUZ, YURI PAULINA MARTINEZ, HECTOR SANTIAGO MARTINEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago Hilario v. Garland
as 21-13
Petitioner: ALEJANDRO SANTIAGO HILARIO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff: Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court: Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jennifer Milici
Interested Party: Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner: NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lopez Santiago v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1369
Petitioner: ADRIAN LOPEZ SANTIAGO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marroquin-Tuchez v. Garland
as 22-985
Petitioner: ABIGAIL SANDRA MARROQUIN-TUCHEZ and WERNER SANTIAGO PINEDA-MARROQUIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?