Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Katileo Searcy v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05445
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katileo Searcy
Javier Avila v. United Parcel Service Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv03570
Plaintiff:
Javier Avila
Defendant:
Does, United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Omar Zanders v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04133
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Omar Zanders
Lynn W. Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06114
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holl v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05856
Plaintiff:
Randall Holl
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bryant Family Vineyard v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Bryant Family Vineyard
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norman Harris et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv03980
Defendant:
Crawford and Company, Does, Carlos Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Harris and Normans Rare Guitars Inc
Lisa Flores et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01182
Plaintiff:
Lisa Flores and Mary Lee
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co, United Parcel Service General Services Co, United Parcel Service Inc and others
Jamie Lewis v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2010cv09520
Defendant:
Does, United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lewis
The Upper Deck Company, LLC et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2010cv07424
Plaintiff:
The Upper Deck Company, Inc. and The Upper Deck Company, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
