Cases 41 - 50 of 1,890
Golubowski v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al.
as 24-1036
Plaintiff:
PHILIP GOLUBOWSKI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC., BAIJU BHATT, JAN HAMMER and others
Other:
VINOD SODHA and AMEE SODHA
Amaya, et al. v. Menzies Aviation Usa Inc
as 24-974
Respondent:
DORA PATRICIA AMAYA, an individual and ANIBAL SILVA, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Petitioner:
MENZIES AVIATION USA INC
Torres, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al.
as 24-907
Respondent:
ROMULO TORRES and SAM ROSENFIELD, individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
BOTANIC TONICS, LLC, NOWHERE PARTNERS, LLC and HYDRA623 HOLDINGS, LLC
Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
as 24-913
Respondent:
ANTHONY BUSH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION
Williams, et al. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 24-933
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WILLIAMS, LADON CLINE and PAUL CONTRERAS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC., an Arkansas corporation
Hopgood v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 24-911
Plaintiff:
WALTER HOPGOOD, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Seneca, et al. v. Homeaglow Inc
as 24-887
Plaintiff:
SETH SENECA and LISA ANDOH, individually on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HOMEAGLOW INC, a Delaware corporation doing business as Dazzling Cleaning
Rocha v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
as 24-864
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ROCHA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
Omnity Consulting, LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Omnity Consulting, LLC dba Harlem Shake (West 124th Street) and Omnity Consulting, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Harlem Shake (West 124th Street)
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Fine v. Kansas City Life Insurance Company
as 24-747
Respondent:
ROBERT F. FINE, Individually and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
