Cases 41 - 50 of 790
Ramos-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3774
Petitioner:
ERICA RAMOS-RAMOS, SARA LUPITA CARRILLO-RAMOS and SANTA ROSA CARRILLO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosas-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 23-3564
Petitioner:
MARIA TERESA ROSAS-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Soto De La Rosa v. Garland
as 23-3451
Petitioner:
JOSE ISABEL SOTO DE LA ROSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Trejo Reynoso, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3421
Petitioner:
MOISES TREJO REYNOSO, ROSA TREJO REYNOSO, ISRAEL TREJO REYNOSO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 23-3312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JERI FEDERICKS and others
De La Rosa Lemus De Herrera, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2961
Petitioner:
WENDY MARISOL DE LA ROSA LEMUS DE HERRERA, NESTOR AARON HERRERA DE LA ROSA, HAMILTON SAMUEL HERRERA DE LA ROSA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Rosas v. Saavedra
as 2:2023cv01549
Petitioner:
Jorge Angelo Montoro Rosas
Respondent:
Ana Cristina Velasquez Saavedra
State of California v. Azuma Corporation, et al
as 23-16200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellant:
AZUMA CORPORATION, PHILLIP DEL ROSA, in his personal and official capacity as Chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria, DARREN ROSE, in his personal and official capacity as Vice-chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria and others
Mejia Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2291
Petitioner:
ROSA DEL CARMEN MEJIA HERNANDEZ and MARCO DAVID HERNANDEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
