Cases 41 - 50 of 2,733
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Yichen Lin v. Leon Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Yichen Lin
Defendant:
Leon Rodriguez, Laura Zuchowski and Mark Hazuda
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cao Hui v. Leon Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Cao Hui and Hui Cao
Petitioner:
Director Mark J Hazuda
Defendant:
USCIS USCIS, Laura Zuchowski, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Franco Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2305
Petitioner:
EDER JOSUE FRANCO RODRIGUEZ, ANA YADIRA VALENCIA OCHOA and NICOLE FRANCO VALENCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Saldana Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2130
Petitioner:
YENNY PAOLA SALDANA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Garcia Rodriguez
as 24-1939
Defendant:
JOSE DE JESUS GARCIA RODRIGUEZ and Caballo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brookins v. Acosta, et al.
as 24-1801
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. BROOKINS
Defendant:
F. ACOSTA, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, R. SOTO, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, A. SHAW, Appeals Coordinator at SATF-Corcoran and others
Pineda Rosa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1682
Petitioner:
SARAI ELIZABETH PINEDA ROSA, SONIA ADALI RODRIGUEZ PINEDA, EDWIN ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ RENDEROS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
