Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Salomon Hernandez Castro, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70183
Petitioner:
SALOMON HERNANDEZ CASTRO and ALEJANDRINA MALDONADO JARDINEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Juan Rosas-Ventura
as 8:2010mj00465
Material Witne:
Maribel Cruz-Sanchez, Patricia Flores-Molina, Noe Guzman-Vela and others
Defendant:
Juan Rosas-Ventura (2)
Plaintiff:
USA
Salomon Manzanarez M, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73210
Petitioner:
SALOMON MANZANAREZ M, AKA Salomon Manzanarez-Melchor and ADELA HERNANDEZ-CLAUDIO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Esquivias-Salomon
as 2:2010mj01201
Defendant:
Juan Ramon Esquivias-Salomon (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Juan Ramon Esquivias-Salomon
as 2:2010mj01201
Defendant:
Juan Ramon Esquivias-Salomon (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Henry Barends, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70965
Petitioner:
HENRY SALOMON ALBERT BARENDS and NURHAYATI BURHANUDDIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Salomon Hernandez Castro, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73468
Petitioner:
SALOMON HERNANDEZ CASTRO and ALEJANDRINA MALDONADO JARDINEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Orens v. Levi Strauss & Co. et al
as 5:2003cv05605
Plaintiff:
Richard Orens and Metzler Investment GmbH
Defendant:
Levi Strauss & Co. , Philip A. Marineau , William B. Chiasson and others
Movant:
Muzinich & Co. and General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, the Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit and Metzler Investment GmbH
Objector:
Thomas Walsh and Robert Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
USA v. Salomon Garcia-Rodriguez
as 09-50454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALOMON GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Jose Alejandro Salomon v. Rodney Deon Walker
as 2:2009cv06441
Plaintiff:
Jose Alejandro Salomon and Jose Alejandro Salomon
Defendant:
Rodney Deon Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
