Cases 51 - 60 of 159
Kirk Bauer v. Sue Washburn, et al
as 20-35090
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY RATH, Oregon State Law Library Coordinator, Dome Building in Salem, WALKER, Captain, TOM LEMENS, Assistant Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK MICHAEL BAUER
Defendant:
CAREY, MARY TANGNEY, DOME BUILDING, in Salem, Oregon and others
FTC v. Carey Howe, et al
as 20-55091
Defendant:
MJ WEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, Relief Defendant, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP, a corporation, DBA Arete Financial Freedom and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OLIVER POMAZI, individually and as an officer or director of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; and J&L Enterprise LLC, CAREY G. HOWE, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investments, Inc., SHUNMIN MIKE HSU, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
FTC v. Carey Howe, et al
as 20-55092
Defendant:
MJ WEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, Relief Defendant, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP, a corporation, DBA Arete Financial Freedom and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OLIVER POMAZI, individually and as an officer or director of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; and J&L Enterprise LLC, CAREY G. HOWE, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investments, Inc., SHUNMIN MIKE HSU, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investment, Inc. and others
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. ILWU, et al
as 20-35037
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE SUHR, an individual, MIKE MCMURTREY, an individual, TODD ENGLERT, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLUMBIA EXPORT TERMINAL, LLC
Seirus Innovative Accessories, et al v. USDC-ORP
as 19-73247
Petitioner:
WENDY M. CAREY, SCOTT DENIKE, ROBERT MURPHY, 'Bob' and others
Not Yet Classified:
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT MURPHY and In re: SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC.
Columbia Sportswear North Amer v. Seirus Innovative Accessories,, et al
as 19-36047
Defendant / Appellant:
SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC., a Utah corporation, MICHAEL J. CAREY, WENDY M. CAREY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
MAN-SIK (PAUL) PARK, an individual, VENTEX CO., LTD., a foreign company, KYUNG-CHAN GO, an individual and others
Federal Trade Commission v. American Financial Support Services Inc. et al
as 4:2019mc80278
Defendant:
Ruddy Palacios, Shunmin Hsu, J&L Enterprise LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Lucy Ulikhanova, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 19-56286
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA HERRERA SOSA, in her personal capacity, STEVE CAREY, (Stephen) in his personal capacity, MARAL HELWAJIAN, in her personal capacity and others
Defendant:
JOANNE COTHERN, in her personal capacity, HOLLY BRUCE, in her personal capacity and DOES, 1-10 inclusive
Plaintiff / Appellant:
P. G., a minor, individual and LUCY ULIKHANOVA, individual
Federal Trade Commission v. American Financial Support Services Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02109
Defendant:
Ruddy Palacios, Carey G. Howe, Jay Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert Mockler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2019cv07124
Defendant:
Thomas Maddock, Mary P. Carey, Cecelia Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
