Cases 51 - 60 of 111
Motts LLP v. Tasty Cloud Vape Company
as 2:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
Motts LLP
Defendant:
Tasty Cloud Vape Company
Hani Yasin et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
S. A., S. B., S. C. and others
Defendant:
Carla Alvarenga, Gregory Chase, Leroy Cloud, Jr and others
American Wild Horse Campaign, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 17-35963
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN, THE CLOUD FOUNDATION, RETURN TO FREEDOM and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, Department of the Interior, NEIL KORNZE, Director, Bureau of Land Management, ELLIOT TRAHER, Field Manager, Jarbridge Field Office, Bureau of Land Management and others
Armando Montoya v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01626
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Claiming Any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in the Property Described in the Complaint, Adverse to Plaintiffs Title, or Any Cloud On Plaintiffs Title Th, Does, Wachovia Mortgage Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Montoya
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
j2 Cloud Services, LLC et al v. Fax87 et al
as 1:2017mc09752
Plaintiff:
j2 Cloud Services, LLC and Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Fax87, Farjad Fani, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc. and others
j2 Cloud Services LLC et al v. Fax87 et al
as 2:2017ms00037
Plaintiff:
Advanced Messaging Technologies Inc and j2 Cloud Services LLC
Defendant:
Robert Beaulieu, Efax4less, Farjad Fani and others
Louis Nemeth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-55567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS C. NEMETH
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-3, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
