Cases 51 - 60 of 2,078
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4463
Petitioner:
LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chang-Bermudez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4462
Petitioner:
OKEL DANIEL CHANG-BERMUDEZ, KAREN JUDITH PEREZ-MURILLO and TIFFANI DANIELA CHANG-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez-Peralta, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4406
Petitioner:
JOSE WILLS PEREZ-PERALTA, I, NANCY MARILU BARNICA LOPEZ, I and ALAYA PEREZ-BARNICA, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chitay-Cante, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4323
Petitioner:
EDUARDO CHITAY-CANTE, WENDY ELIZABETH ARCHILA-PEREZ, CRISTHIAN ALEXANDER GALINDO-ARCHILA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. De Jesus Nieto Yepez et al
as 8:2023cv02400
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Teresita De Jesus Nieto Yepez individually and d/b/a Playas Bar, Martin De Jesus Morales Perez individually and d/b/a Playas Bar and Playas Bar, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Playas Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
United States of America v. Perez-Ayala
as 23-4228
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIA ISABEL PEREZ-AYALA
Perez-Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4240
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO PEREZ-PEREZ, MIKE ESTIBEN PEREZ-BARRERA, AURY FABIOLA BARRERA-GODOY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Yanes Perez v. Garland
as 23-4125
Petitioner:
EFRAIN YANES PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Perez v. Garland
as 23-4137
Petitioner:
OMAR EDUARDO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
