Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Michael Yocom v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-73833
:
In re: MICHAEL ALLAN YOCOM
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLAN YOCOM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BEN CURRY, Warden
New Sensations, Inc. v. Does 1-1474
as 2:2011mc00089
Plaintiff:
New Sensations, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-1474
Movant:
Curry Custom Computers
Curry v. Lawrie et al
as 2:2011cv00908
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Curry
Defendant:
Asst AG W. Thomas Lawrie, AG Douglas F. Gansler and Comm. Fin. Reg. Mark A. Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PNGC, et al v. USDOE, et al
as 11-71401
Petitioner:
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, BLACHLY-LANE COUNTY COOPERATIVE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. and others
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Robert Parrish v. Ben Curry
as 11-71373
Petitioner:
ROBERT ERIC PARRISH
Respondent:
BEN CURRY, Warden
-RCF Ural King v. Ben Curry
as 5:2004cv01107
Respondent:
Ben Curry, Ben Curry and G J Giurbino
Petitioner:
Ural King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Yocom v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-70107
:
In re: MICHAEL ALLAN YOCOM
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLAN YOCOM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BEN CURRY, Warden
Barry Jameson v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY SIMON JAMESON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, individual and official capacity, Warden of California Mens Colony, D. ENGLER, individual and official capacity, Correctional Counselor II, T. L. COOK, individual and official capacity, Captain of guards at CMC East and others
PNGC, et al v. BPA
as 10-73402
Petitioner:
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, BLACHLY-LANE COUNTY COOPERATIVE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
