Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Rafael Montas Pimentel v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71323
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MANUEL MONTAS PIMENTEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
David Masa Arauz et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Miranda Abrego, Fermin Miranda Alvarez, David Masa Arauz and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Carlos Munoz Barria et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
Andres Ortega Abrego, Antonio Palacio Abrego, Reys Pimentel Acosta and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Karina Pimentel-Ornelas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70437
Petitioner:
KARINA PIMENTEL-ORNELAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Cortes Pimentel, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74641
Petitioner:
JOSE SALVADOR CORTES PIMENTEL, AKA Jose Salvador Cortez Pimentel and MARIA ERIKA DIAZ ORTIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Maria Ornelas De Pimentel v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74179
Petitioner:
MARIA ORNELAS DE PIMENTEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Maura Guzman-Pimentel v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-72939
Petitioner:
MAURA GUZMAN-PIMENTEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Ramiro Pimentel-Garcia
as 08-30232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMIRO PIMENTEL-GARCIA
Pimentel v. B.N. Development Company, Inc.
as 3:2007mc80074
Plaintiff:
Mariano J. Pimentel
Defendant:
B.N. Development Company, Inc. and B.N. Development Company, Inc.
3rd Party Defendant:
Bartko Zankel Tarrant & Miller, Bartko Zankel Tarrant & Miller, John J. Bartko and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
