Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Kenneth B Riley v. United States
as 2:2012cv05658
Defendant:
Does and United States
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B Riley
In Re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 4:2012mc80020
Plaintiff:
Samuel Michael Keller , Bryan Cummings , Lamarr Watkins and others
Defendant:
Electronic Arts Inc., National Collegiate Athletic Association, Collegiate Licensing Company and others
Movant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Abraham et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Mercy Abraham , Paul Aguilar , Scott Barnard and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport & Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 2:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Byron Bishop, Bryan Cummings, Ray Ellis and others
Defendant:
Collegiate Licensing Company, Electronic Arts Inc, IMG Worldwide Inc and others
Movant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
In Re:
NCAA Studtent-Athlete Name and Likeness Licensing Litigation
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Riley
as 3:2011cv02042
Petitioner:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and Piper Jaffray & Co.
Respondent:
Mark C. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, San Diego, County of, David J. Danielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davison Design & Development Inc. et al v. Riley
as 3:2011cv02970
Plaintiff:
Davison Design & Development Inc. , XL Marketing Corp. , Spire Vision Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Catherine Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Davison Design & Development Inc. et al v. Riley
as 4:2011cv02970
Plaintiff:
Davison Design & Development Inc. , XL Marketing Corp. , Spire Vision Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Catherine Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
