Cases 61 - 70 of 818
Bonilla Ramos v. Garland
as 23-453
Petitioner:
JOSE RICARDO BONILLA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marcos Ramos et al v. Regal Medical Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ramos, Rigoberto Ramos and Argere Frudakis
Defendant:
Regal Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ramos Bonilla, et al. v. Garland
as 23-252
Petitioner:
MARVIN ERNESTO RAMOS BONILLA and YESENIA ABIGAIL VELADO DE RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Linares Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-119
Petitioner:
IRIS LINARES RAMOS and ROSSELYN SOLORZANO LINARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Escalante Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-43
Petitioner:
CRISTINA ESCALANTE RAMOS and MAXIMILIANA LARA MENDOZA ESCALANTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Resincoy Ramos v. Garland
as 23-25
Petitioner:
PASCUAL GIOVANI RESINCOY RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos Pineda, et al. v. Garland
as 22-2000
Petitioner:
DENISE BEATRIZ RAMOS PINEDA and MADELIN DAGERI MELGAR RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kristofer Seneca v. USDC-AZPIn re: Kristofer Seneca v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70268
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KRISTOFER MICHAEL SENECA, CYNTHIA M. KOEPPEL, named Cynthia M Koeppel (Nagron), CO IV, QUINN HARVEY, CO II and others
Petitioner:
KRISTOFER MICHAEL SENECA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Guevara Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1903
Petitioner:
PATRICIA CRISTELA GUEVARA RAMOS, LITZY GISSELLE ORTEZ GUEVARA and MELANIE CRISTEL GUEVARA RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
