Cases 61 - 70 of 38,299
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant:
J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
United States of America v. Cunningham
as 24-3021
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AARON JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM
Grayson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno
as 24-3011
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY BRIAN GRAYSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Babu
as 24-3023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOSH BABU
United States of America v. Elvira-Garcia
as 24-2994
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUAN ELVIRA-GARCIA
Sundby, et al. v. USDC, SD
as 24-2988
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY and EDITH LITTLEFIELD SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Interested Party:
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE CO
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2978
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Padilla v. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, et al.
as 24-2985
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL PADILLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
United States of America v. Gessen
as 24-2979
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALLEN GESSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
