Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Team Kennedy v. Aguilar
as 2:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Team Kennedy
Defendant:
Francisco V. Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Team Kennedy vs Francisco V. Aguilar
as 2:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Team Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singh Banga v. Kanios, et al.
as 24-2917
Plaintiff:
NAVJEET SINGH BANGA
Defendant:
CHRIS GUS KANIOS, DEAN BARBIERI, ELEANOR ARMSTRONG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-805
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, KEATON RILEY, Chief of State to Patrick Kennedy, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Rogers v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-738
Plaintiff:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, KEATON RILEY, Chief of State to Patrick Kennedy, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff and others
Team Kennedy v. McGrane
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Team Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil McGrane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Kallaus v. Johns et al
as 3:2023cv06627
Plaintiff:
Patrick Kallaus
Defendant:
Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Shelee M. T. Kimura and others
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 23-4028
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
KATHERINE LESTER, Sacramento Police Chief, K. SIMMONS, #693, P. FONG, #3015 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
