Cases 1 - 10 of 1,225
Kazemi v. USCIS et al
as 2:2024cv07936
Defendant:
USCIS, DIRECTOR UR MENDOZA JADDOU and David Radel
Plaintiff:
Somayeh Kazemi
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv06525
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas
Petitioner:
Gustavo Aldofo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mendoza-Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-4905
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ABEL BENJAMIN MENDOZA-MENDOZA
Nuclear Care Partners, LLC v. Mendoza et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Defendant:
Stephen Burr, Ruben Mendoza and Atomic Workers Alliance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Care Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Rodriguez-Mendoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4815
Petitioner:
ANDRES RICARDO RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA, D.M.R.F and JURLEY ANDREA FARFAN-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4767
Petitioner:
JAIME MENDOZA CRUZ, JASON RAFAEL MENDOZA CRUZ, NANCY ZULEYMA CRUZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dongdong Ma v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv06184
Defendant:
Rosemary Langley Melville, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Dongdong Ma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nunez Gaytan, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4451
Petitioner:
XIMENA MICHELE MENDOZA NUNEZ and MONICA CONCEPCION NUNEZ GAYTAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza v. Town of Gilbert, et al.
as 24-4270
Defendant:
NATHAN MARTIN, an individual and TOWN OF GILBERT, a municipality
Plaintiff:
JANISSA MENDOZA, an individual
Lianbiao Xu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv05905
Plaintiff:
Lianbiao Xu
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
