Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alvarado-Sanabria v. Garland
as 21-172
Petitioner:
JESUS ALVARADO-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
S. G., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A. D. G., DYANNA SANABRIA, N. B., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Araceli Boyce and others
Defendant:
3568 MOTOR LLC, HIRO KOBAYASHI and DOES, 1 through 10
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, PAUL KORETZ and VINCENT BERTONI
Maria Diaz Sanabria, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73624
Petitioner:
ALEXIA NICOL MELGAR-DIAZ and MARIA DEL CARMEN DIAZ SANABRIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jorge Sandoval-Sanabria v. William Barr
as 19-72468
Petitioner:
JORGE ZULEIDT SANDOVAL-SANABRIA, AKA Jorge Sandoval
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Sandra Sanabria v. TGF Management Group Holdco, Inc.
as 2:2018cv03059
Defendant:
DOES, Maria Diaz, Insperity PEO Services, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sanabria
Ricardo Sanabria-Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70534
Petitioner:
RICARDO SANABRIA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Armando Sanabria-Valdez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73411
Petitioner:
ARMANDO SANABRIA-VALDEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
S.G. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv09003
Defendant:
3568 Motor LLC, Vincent Bertoni, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
N. B., A. G., A. D. G. and others
MKay, Inc. et al v. City of Huntington Park, et al
as 2:2017cv01467
Defendant:
C4Eversystems, LLC, City of Huntington Park, Does and others
Plaintiff:
CBD, Inc., Cage Collective, Inc., Cruz Verde, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
