Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3320
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, MOYRA COOP and WILLIAM GROVES
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC and DEMIAN HEALD
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, an individual, MOYRA COOP, an individual and WILLIAM GROVES, an individual, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of similarly situated persons
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company and DEMIAN HEALD, an individual; and the marital community comprised of Demian Heald and Doe Heald
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC et al v. Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
as 2:2024mc00024
Plaintiff:
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC and Charal Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC et al v. Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
as 8:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
Plaintiff:
BATON ROUGE VENTURES, LLC and Charal Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC v. Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
Defendant:
BATON ROUGE VENTURES, LLC and Charal Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC v. Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2024mc00018
Plaintiff:
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC and Charal Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
