Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant:
FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Zuniga De Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3124
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE ELIZABETH ZUNIGA DE VASQUEZ and MONICA LIZETH VASQUEZ ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gutierrez-Montoya, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2378
Petitioner:
ISIS DAMARY GUTIERREZ-MONTOYA, BRITTANY YICEL ZUNIGA-GUTIERREZ and ANTHONY STEVEN ZUNIGA-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes-Zuniga, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2390
Petitioner:
ANA LETICIA REYES-ZUNIGA and I. Y. R. Z.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Dawes v. Ausbury, et al.
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWES
Defendant:
HOWARD AUSBURY, Lt. at RJD, MARIO ZUNIGA, Correctional Officer, SHELLANO, Correctional Officer and others
Almidon-Miranda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-634
Petitioner:
GEORGE BRIAN ALMIDON-MIRANDA, YESENIA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA and GAHELA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zuniga v. Gowan Milling, LLC, et al.
as 23-4091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIBEL ZUNIGA
Defendant / Appellee:
GOWAN MILLING, LLC
Defendant:
LOURDES GONZALEZ and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Jane and John Doe 1-10; ABC Companies 1-10; XYZ Corps. 1-10; and ABC Partnerships 1-10
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
