Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mueller v. Clore, et al.
as 24-4964
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. MUELLER
Defendant:
MARK NOOTH, Institution Administrator - O.D.O.C - Salem, OR, ROBERT CLORE, ATTORNEY, Institution Counselor - D.R.C.I - Madras, OR, Mr. BOYER, Correctional Services Mgr. - D.R.C.I - Madras, OR and others
Mueller v. Ackley, et al.
as 24-1270
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MUELLER
Defendant:
ZACK ACKLEY, Superintendent DRCI, CARTER, DRCI Health Services Manager, BEAMER and others
Michelle Barnes, et al v. FAA
as 14-71180
Petitioner:
MICHELLE BARNES, an individual, PATRICK CONRY, an individual, BLAINE ACKLEY, an individual and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Ackley v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 1:2010cv00622
Plaintiff:
Douglas K. Ackley
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN EQUITY C-125-B: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION, ET AL.
as 3:1973cv00127
Counter Defendant:
"A" Enterprise, 14 Sara Circle Land Trust, 1997 Revocable Family Trust and others
Interested Party:
Linda Ackley, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Chief Deputy Water C Jim Shaw
Defendant:
Ernie Angeles, Donald Berirati, William S. Boyanich and others
Counter Claimant:
Wayne D. Bowman, Manuel L. Puerta, Jr. and Gerald J. Wright
Cross Defendant:
Scott DeChambeau
Creditor:
Rees Trust dtd 4/14/03
Special Master:
U.S. Board of Water Commissioners
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Walker River Paiute Tribe
Juan M Achan et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv04334
Plaintiff:
Juan M Achan, Daniel P Ackley, Stephen R Addleman and others
Defendant:
Defendant City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Abbe, et al v. City of San Diego CA
as 08-80021
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MARCUS R. ABBE, THOMAS E. ABBOTT, Jr., DAVID G. ABRAMS and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
