Cases 1 - 10 of 1,310
Cardona Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3759
Petitioner:
SERGIO ALEXANDER CARDONA GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rey-Riano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3712
Petitioner:
VIVIANA MARCELA REY-RIANO, ALEXANDER WESLEY ARDILA-URREGO, VALERIE SOFIA ARDILA-REY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rafael-Diego, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3722
Petitioner:
EULALIA RAFAEL-DIEGO, ALEXANDER GREGORIO-RAFAEL and ZAYRA GREGORIO-RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/2024
as 3:2024mc80145
Not Yet Classified:
Leonardo Mir Norouzi, Luis Alberto Angeles, Humberto Topete and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Estrada-Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-3612
Petitioner:
RENE ALEXANDER ESTRADA-MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexander Almansky v. Sing for Service, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04769
Plaintiff:
Alexander Almansky
Defendant:
Sing for Service, LLC doing business as Mepco, Matrix Warranty Solutions, Inc., Road America Motor Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander v. Chime
as 3:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Chime
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Alexander v. Bank of America
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. McKinley P. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv04385
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
McKinley P. Alexander individually doing business as Swank Mens Fashion and Swank Mens Fashion LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Swank Mens Fashion
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
