Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Venkatachalapathy v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv04395
Plaintiff: Deepak Venkatachalapathy
Defendant: Spencer Neumann, Reed Hastings and Netflix, Inc.
Petitioner: T J Cab Management Inc.
REV 973 LLC v. John Mouren-Laurens, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1998cv10690
Defendant: Unocal 76 (PRP ID No. 21965), Dave Housel, Containerized Chemical (PRP ID No. 4352) and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: John Mouren-Laurens, Nicole Marie Mouren-Laurens, Mireille Mouren-Laurens and others
Cross Defendant: Leach Oil Co Inc, Roes, Teresa Mouren-Laurens and others
Petitioner: Orora North America dba Corru Kraft, Morris Motors Inc., Gallade Chemical, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Revere Financial Corporation, Urethane Systems International Inc and Jerry Fine
Special Master: Judge Carl West and Carl J West
Counter Claimant: Estate of Joseph Mouren - Laurens by Claudine Mouren-Laurens
Counter Defendant: Ugalde Trucking Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01257
Plaintiff: L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc, LA City Cab, LLC, Bell Cab Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Stewart Rosen
Intervenor: A White and Yellow Cab, Inc
Not Classified By Court: The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv06385
Plaintiff: Desoto Cab Company, Inc.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. , Uber USA, LLC , Rasier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
A White and Yellow Cab, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05163
Plaintiff: A White and Yellow Cab, Inc.
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53
Trustees of The National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan v. West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. I et al
as 2:2015cv03643
Defendant: Sidney F. Siez, West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. I and West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. II
Plaintiff: Trustees of The National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan
Trustees of The National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan v. West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. I et al
as 2:2015mc00108
Plaintiff: Trustees of The National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(K) Retirement Plan
Defendant: West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. I and West Coast Elevator Cab Interiors, Inc. II
L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01257
Plaintiff: L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. , Administrative Services SD, LLC , All Yellow Taxi, Inc. and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Edwin F. McPherson v. Yellow Cab of South Bay Co-Operative Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05335
Defendant: Does and Yellow Cab of South Bay Co-Operative Inc
Plaintiff: Edwin F. McPherson
Gragg v. Orange Cab et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013mc80109
Plaintiff: Torrey Gragg
Defendant: Orange Cab and RideCharge
Movant: Twilio, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?