Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Castellanos Gutierrez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3247
Petitioner:
LILIANA MARISOL CASTELLANOS GUTIERREZ, XIMENA SHECCITH LOPEZ CASTELLANOS and VALERIA POLETTE LOPEZ CASTELLANOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media v. Castellanos Fierro
as 5:2024cv02756
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Karen Julieth Castellanos Fierro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Gibson v. Castellanos, et al.
as 24-2280
Plaintiff:
REGINALD GIBSON
Defendant:
E. CASTELLANOS, Correctional Officer and C. RILEY, Correctional Officer
Castellanos-Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1386
Petitioner:
ELVIN NAHUM CASTELLANOS-MURILLO and LEANDRO CASTELLANOS-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castellanos v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Northwest, et al.
as 24-1026
Plaintiff:
EMILY CASTELLANOS
Defendant:
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 49
Vasquez Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3728
Petitioner:
EVELYN JOHANA VASQUEZ GARCIA and EMILY ALANI CASTELLANOS VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Booker v. Lee, et al.
as 23-3640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. BOOKER
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEE, Sergeant, J. GARIBAY, Correctional Officer, R. CASTELLANOS, Correctional Officer and others
Castellanos v. The CBE Group, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01769
Plaintiff:
Felipe Castellanos
Defendant:
The CBE Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castellanos Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1949
Petitioner:
BENITO CASTELLANOS GARCIA and ZENAIDA FENTANES MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
