Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lamont Karriem v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, BOBBY D. CAGLE, Director; his personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kenneth Moore v. Brad Cain, et al
as 19-35002
Defendant / Appellee:
T.L.C. COMMITTEE, N. MARTINEZ, Nurse, T. GRAINER, Appeal Grievance Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EVERETT MOORE
Masonic Association C.C. Int., Inc v. Corporation of Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2018mc00074
Defendant:
Bobby D. Cagle, Corporation of Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Masonic Association C.C. Int., Inc
Masonic Association C.C. Int., Inc v. Corporation of Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2018cv05471
Defendant:
Bobby D. Cagle, Corporation of Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Masonic Association C.C. Int., Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cintas Corporation v. Anderson et al
as 3:2006cv05079
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Darren Mitchell Anderson , Jason Scott Bigelow , Jonathan Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
