Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Rose Karam v. University of Arizona, et al
as 20-15099
Defendant: SUZANNE TOYAMA-BODNAR, DAVID LEE, THAO TRUONG and others
Defendant / Appellee: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, GENOA HEALTHCARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSE ANN KARAM
In re: Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56390
Defendant / Appellee: MRC RECEIVABLES, ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: SEAN HARTRANFT
Plaintiff: LAVANCHY JOHNSON, RICHARD RAMCHARITAR, RUTH MOYA and others
Hettema et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
as 3:2018cv06132
Defendant: USCIS Field Office Director, USCIS, DHS and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Hettema and Ahu Hettema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Christopher Robinson v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv00992
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Robinson
Michael Robinson v. P. Brazelton
as 12-73418
Petitioner: MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON
Respondent: P. D. BRAZELTON
In Re: Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
as 3:2011md02286
Plaintiff: Alexandra Zenoniani, Heather Moynihan, Cynthia Colacchia and others
Defendant: Unidentified Collector, Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Special Master: Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman
Petitioner: Eunice Brooks and Vladimir Francois
Intervenor Plaintiff: SEAN HARTRANFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Midland Funding, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02261
Plaintiff: Christopher Robinson
Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?