Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Perkins v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
as 24-3329
Plaintiff:
PRESTON D. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PANORAMA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DENNIS KARIGER, LUCKY LACT, LLC and others
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Cox, et al. v. Gritman Medical Center, et al.
as 24-1947
Plaintiff:
MARK COX, ESTATE OF SUSAN A COX, by and through Personal Representative Mark Cox and SUSAN A. COX
Defendant:
GRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER, PATRICIA N. MARCIANO, MD, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named "Others TBD" and others
Cox v. Krpin, et al.
as 24-1224
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE COX, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN KRPIN, Doctor and MULE CREEK PRISON
Cox v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana
as 24-694
Petitioner:
LEWELLYN CHARLES COX, IV
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Howard v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-400
Plaintiff / Appellee:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, DAVID DRUMMOND, JESSE COX and others
Defendant:
KERCHEN and MALLINGER
Kleidman v. Murphy, et al.
as 24-320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER KLEIDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNIE MURPHY, JONATHAN GASKIN, MICHAEL MAIDY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sloan v. Improving Impact, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jared Sloan
Defendant:
Improving Impact, Inc., Jeremiah Cox, Chris Williams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
