Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
as 24-4740
Defendant:
DANZIG, ROSENBERG SHPALL & ZEIGEN, APLC, SAN DIEGO BIZ LAW, APC and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. DAVIS
Davis v. General Atomics
as 24-1909
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. DAVIS
Defendant:
GENERAL ATOMICS, Owners, Officers, Div/Subs, N/L BLUE, DANZIG and others
Davis v. Davis, et al.
as 24-155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASTARTE DAVIS, Representing herself, Real Party In Interest, Successor in Interest, Successor Trustee, and legal representative of her husband Loyal Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY DAVIS, JOAN MAHER, LOYAL D. DAVIS and others
Williene Davis v. CalPERS, et al
as 21-17106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIENE D. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
Astarte Davis v. Richard Seeborg, et al
as 21-15463
Defendant / Appellee:
LOYAL D. DAVIS, LAUREL D. BEELER, Magistrate Judge, MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of the Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASTARTE DAVIS
Lance Williams v. California Men's Colony, et al
as 21-55159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. DAVIS, Classification Staff Representative; individual and official capacity, YUVALLE, Correctional Officer; individual and official capacity, D. JOSEPH, Correctional Officer and others
Anthony Davis v. Ron Haynes
as 20-35426
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES, Stafford Creek Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227
Susha Halberstam v. Craft Brew Alliance, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01243
Defendant:
David R. Lord, Kevin R. Kelly, Jacqueline S. Woodward and others
Plaintiff:
Susha Halberstam
Anthony Davis v. Ron Haynes
as 20-35060
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES, Stafford Creek Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
