Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Valdovinos Enriquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1272
Petitioner:
IRMA VALDOVINOS ENRIQUEZ and FERNANDO DANIEL RAMIREZ VALDOVINOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Richard Shreves v. USDC-MHE
as 21-71407
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RICHARD E. SHREVES, DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Jose Ramirez Cruz, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73606
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL RAMIREZ CRUZ, ROXANA DEL CARMEN DURAN-ZEPEDA and JORDAN DANIEL RAMIREZ-DURAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Ramirez
as 20-30245
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE DANIEL RAMIREZ, AKA Jose Danny Ramirez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Ramirez-Medina v. USDHS, et al
as 19-36034
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL RAMIREZ-MEDINA
Daniel Ramirez-Medina v. William Barr
as 19-72850
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAMIREZ-MEDINA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Francisco Ramirez-Olivares v. William Barr
as 19-70606
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO DANIEL RAMIREZ-OLIVARES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Daniel Ramirez v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07684
Defendant:
Amperex Technology Limited, Does, Samsung C And T America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Estate of Eric Rivera et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv06939
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Eric Rivera, Phillip Malik and Valerie Rivera
Francisco Ramirez-Olivares v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72605
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO DANIEL RAMIREZ-OLIVARES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
