Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas Easton v. David Shulkin, et al
as 19-35699
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, KRISTOPHER G. KYES, individually and in his official capacity as DMV/Medical Programs Coordinator, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DMV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DEWEY EASTON
Robert Rosebrock v. Michael Perez, et al
as 19-55387
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PEREZ, an individual, JOEL HENDERSON, an individual and CHRISTIAN PEREZ, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT L. ROSEBROCK
Defendant:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, in his official capacity, ANN BROWN, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Rochelle Gray v. David Shulkin
as 19-15061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCHELLE GRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN
Tybie P. O Bard-Honorato v. David J. Shulkin
as 2:2017cv09179
Plaintiff:
Tybie P. O Bard-Honorato
Defendant:
Dr. David J. Shulkin
In Re: State Court Subpoenas and Bench Warrants for Arrest of Federal Non-Parties
as 2:2017cv09091
Petitioner:
Jedediah R Dixon
In Re:
In Re: State Court Subpoenas and Bench Warrants for Arrest of Federal Non-Parties
Respondent:
Eric John Rogers
Interested Party:
David J Shulkin and United States of America
Michelle Christian Honse v. David J. Shulkin
as 8:2017cv02000
Plaintiff:
Michelle Christian Honse
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin
Maher Roman, M.D. v. David J. Shulkin, M.D., et al
as 5:2017cv01469
Defendant:
Does and David J Shulkin
Plaintiff:
Maher Roman
Maher Roman, M.D. v. David J. Shulkin, M.D., et al
as 2:2017cv05447
Defendant:
Does and David J Shulkin
Plaintiff:
Maher Roman
Ramona Tabib, M.D. v. David J. Shulkin, M.D.
as 2:2017cv05071
Defendant:
DOES and David J Shulkin, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Ramona Tabib, M.D.
Witthoft v. Shulkin et al
as 4:2017cv02680
Defendant:
Meghan Flanz and David J. Shulkin
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Witthoft
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
