Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 169
State of California v. Satosmith
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff: State of California
Defendant: Dustin Satosmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dustin Andersen et al v. NEXA Mortgage, LLC
as 8:2024cv00619
Plaintiff: Dustin Andersen
Defendant: NEXA Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Murugaiyan v. Anderson, et al.
as 24-1299
Plaintiff: SENTHIL MOHAN MURUGAIYAN
Defendant: KATE ANDERSON, General Manager, ESA, Pleasanton, DUSTIN MARTIN, District Manager and ESA MANAGEMENT LLC
Martin v. Fuller-Brisbon, et al.
as 24-404
Plaintiff / Appellee: DUSTIN MARTIN
Defendant / Appellant: MIGUEL FULLER-BRISBON and JAMES BUCKLEY
Darden v. Crowd Management Service
as 24-325
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUSTIN THOMAS HOUSE DARDEN
Defendant / Appellee: CROWD MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Juarez Zelaya v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-4186
Plaintiff / Appellee: NICOLE JUAREZ ZELAYA, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent, Jacobo Juarez Cedillo
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DUSTIN RICHMOND and JOSEPH HUNT
United States of America v. Henderson
as 23-828
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DUSTIN LEE HENDERSON
Teri Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC, et al
as 22-35319
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERI KEALOHA SAHM and TERI SAHM
Defendant / Appellee: ONSLOW BAY FINANCIAL LLC, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC., DBA PHH Mortgage and others
USA v. Jason Sadler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-30277
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JASON WILLIAM SADLER, AKA Dustin Jay Sweeney

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?