Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Mendez Zacarias v. Garland
as 24-3476
Petitioner:
ELDER RAUL MENDEZ ZACARIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Nair, et al. v. Toth, et al.
as 23-3682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYAKUMAR SUNDARAN NAIR, RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K NAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX TOTH, PAUL LEE, DJ VYZIS and others
Estrada De Leon v. Garland
as 23-642
Petitioner:
ELDER ALEXANDER ESTRADA DE LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez-Lopez v. Garland
as 21-1285
Petitioner:
ELDER GOMEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sierra Club et al v. DeJoy
as 3:2022cv04368
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Elders Climate Action
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Garcia-Gamez de Martinez v. Garland
as 21-1082
Petitioner:
BRENDA GARCIA-GAMEZ DE MARTINEZ and ELDER JOSE MARTINEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crow Indian Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35811
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROW INDIAN TRIBE, CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE, STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
