Cases 1 - 10 of 1,269
Rosales, et al. v. The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, et al.
as 24-3754
Plaintiff:
WALTER ROSALES, ESTATE OF KAREN TOGGERY, ESTATE OF LOUIS AYHULE GOMEZ and others
Defendant:
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO and CONDON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
PATRICK D. WEBB and WEBB & CAREY, APC
Montalvo-Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3649
Petitioner:
ADA NOEMI MONTALVO-RIVERA and BYRON ARTURO GOMEZ-MONTALVO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez v. Elite Labor Services Weeklys, Ltd., et al.
as 24-3594
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO GOMEZ
Defendant:
ELITE LABOR SERVICES WEEKLYS, LTD. and ELITE STAFFING, INC.
Gomez-Chicol, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3377
Petitioner:
HECTOR ANIBAL GOMEZ-CHICOL, ROSA IRIS CANO-LARA, KARIME STACY PAMELA GOMEZ-CANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez v. Elite Labor Services Weeklys, Ltd., et al.
as 24-3261
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO GOMEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general public
Defendant:
ELITE LABOR SERVICES WEEKLYS, LTD., an Illinois corporation, ELITE STAFFING, INC., an Illinois corporation and SOUTHLAND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC., a California corporation
Verduzco-Gomez v. Garland
as 24-3245
Petitioner:
MARIO ALBERTO VERDUZCO-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alas Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner:
FATIMA DEL ROSARIO ALAS GOMEZ and AXEL ALESSANDRO MONGE ALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Montoya Gomez v. Garland
as 24-3242
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MONTOYA GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lee Michael Thompson v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Ocampo-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2989
Petitioner:
LORENA OCAMPO-GOMEZ, EMILY JULIET DELGADO-OCAMPO, JAQUELINE DELGADO-OCAMPO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
