Cases 1 - 10 of 970
Calderon Lopez v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transport Authority, et al.
as 24-3717
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY and CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Gustafson-Feis, et al. v. Mayo, et al.
as 24-3686
Plaintiff:
LISA GUSTAFSON-FEIS and JULIEN FEIS
Defendant:
KEITH MAYO, Doctor, SWEDISH FIRST HILL, CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor and others
Hernandez v. Russell, et al.
as 24-3672
Plaintiff:
FRANK MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PERRY RUSSELL, Warden, RON SCHRECKENGOST, Assistant Warden WSCC, BRIANA HILL, Grievance Report/Assistant and others
The Republic of Nicaragua v. The Lopez-Goyne Family et al
as 3:2024cv03104
Petitioner:
THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
Respondent:
THE LOPEZ-GOYNE FAMILY TRUST, THE GOYNE FAMILY TRUST, THE BOCHNOWSKI FAMILY TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Tudor DuPont, et al. v. Sterling Family Trust, et al.
as 24-2636
Plaintiff:
AL TUDOR DUPONT and AURELIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
STERLING FAMILY TRUST, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, individually and as sole Trustee of Sterling Family Trust, and as Manager of Beverly Hills Properties LLC, DOES, 1-20, inclusive and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Clair Hills v. Garland
as 24-2267
Petitioner:
EDUARDO CLAIR HILLS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
