Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Deutsche Bank National Trust v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al
as 21-15791
Defendant:
SEVEN HILLS MASTER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION and ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC
Cross Defendant:
WILLIAM C. PARKER
Plaintiff:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1
Counter Claimant:
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC
Sepideh Cirino, et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al
as 19-55817
Defendant / Appellee:
ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING, Any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiffs tittle, or any cloud on plaintiffs title thereto, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEPIDEH CIRINO, an individual
Plaintiff:
THE CIRINO FAMILY TRUST, an Irrevocable Trust (plaintiff in pro se personally as well as trustee for the Cirino Family Trust)
Moshe Yhudai v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 2:2018cv04594
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does, Impac Secured Assets Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Moshe Yhudai
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. Impac Secured Assets Corp., et al
as 12-56025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
IMPAC SECURED ASSETS CORP., a California corporation, IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION, a California corporation and IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS INC., a Maryland corporation
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. v. Impac Secured Assets Corp. et al
as 2:2011cv04514
Plaintiff:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Impac Funding Corporation, Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
