Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jacquelyn Miller v. USDC-CALA
as 23-70094
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JACQUELYN MILLER, DYLAN FARRIS, TUSD Chief Personnel Officer of Human Resurces, KEITH BUTLER, TUSD Chief Business Officer of the Business Office and others
Petitioner:
JACQUELYN MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Stephen Lopes, et al v. Fitbit, Inc., et al
as 20-16033
Defendant / Appellee:
FITBIT, INC., JAMES PARK and WILLIAM ZERELLA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD CHESTER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, STEPHEN LOPES and IRVING LUBMAN
Plaintiff:
ANANDA PATTI
Phillips v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv08046
Defendant:
Fitbit, Inc., Laura J. Alber, Glenda J. Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
David Phillips
Estes v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08059
Defendant:
Fitbit, Inc., Christopher Paisley, James Park and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blau v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08297
Defendant:
Glenda Flanagan, Matthew Bromberg, Christopher Paisley and others
Plaintiff:
Martha Blau
Zeynalzadegan et al v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv04297
Plaintiff:
Ameneh Zeynalzadegan and Laura McHugh
Defendant:
William R. Zerella, Fitbit, Inc. and James Park
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Patti v. Fitbit, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv06922
Plaintiff:
Ananda Patti
Defendant:
William Zerella, Fitbit, Inc and James Park
Lopes v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv06665
Defendant:
William Zerella, Fitbit, Inc. and James Park
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lopes
Dua v. Park et al
as 3:2018cv07103
Plaintiff:
Arjan Dua
Defendant:
Fitbit, Inc., Christopher Paisley, James Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wong v. Park et al
as 3:2017cv03677
Plaintiff:
James Wong
Defendant:
James Park, William R. Zerella, Eric N. Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
