Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Serrano-Ordu o v. Garland
as 24-2437
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL SERRANO-ORDU O
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pelayo-Vidriales v. Garland
as 24-2083
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL PELAYO-VIDRIALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cordova-Mejia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
EDGAR ALEXANDER CORDOVA-MEJIA, LEYDEN ALEXANDRA CORDOVA-HENRRIQUEZ, JAIRO RESIERE HENRRIQUEZ-CASTRO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Perez
as 23-3861
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL PEREZ
Pelayo-Vidriales v. Garland
as 23-779
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL PELAYO-VIDRIALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pelayo-Vidriales v. Garland
as 23-691
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL PELAYO-VIDRIALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Renteria de la Rosa v. Garland
as 22-2012
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL RENTERIA DE LA ROSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez Ruvalcaba
as 8:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually and d/b/a Las Vegas Bar and Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually doing business as Las Vegas Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez Ruvalcaba
as 8:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually and d/b/a Las Vegas Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba
as 8:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Gonzalez Ruvalcaba individually doing business as Las Vegas Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
