Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company v. Apparel Limited, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05201
Defendant:
Apparel Limited, Inc. and Apparel Ltd., LLC
Plaintiff:
Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company
Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company v. Apparel Limited, Inc. et al
as 2:2016mc00038
Defendant:
Apparel Limited, Inc. and Apparel Ltd., LLC
Plaintiff:
Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company
Klein v. No Limit, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein and R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
No Limit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commission Act
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff:
IMCA, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff:
Scott Eisler
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Weingarten v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04931
Plaintiff:
Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04934
Plaintiff:
John Pulasky
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Feser v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04074
Plaintiff:
Gail Feser
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bates v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03671
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bates
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
