Cases 1 - 10 of 1,291
Gustafson-Feis, et al. v. Mayo, et al.
as 24-3686
Plaintiff:
LISA GUSTAFSON-FEIS and JULIEN FEIS
Defendant:
KEITH MAYO, Doctor, SWEDISH FIRST HILL, CHRISTOPHER BOONE, Doctor and others
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
Barrett v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-3504
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY LEE BARRETT
Defendant:
SHERRY JOHNSON, ARNP, LISA RAPP, ARNP, T. IRION, Lt. and others
Ragsdale et al v. Leadpoint, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04542
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ragsdale, Carl Yockman and Savannah Berger
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bodenburg v. Apple Inc.
as 24-3335
Plaintiff:
LISA BODENBURG, On Behalf Of Herself And All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neal v. City of Bainbridge Island
as 24-3299
Plaintiff:
LISA C. NEAL
Defendant:
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, a Municipal Corporation
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Perez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2943
Petitioner:
LISA MARIE PEREZ and Lisa Marie Belyew
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
LARRY LORMAN, COLUSA POLICE DEPARTMENT and MATT BEAUCHAMP
Coleman v. City of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-2939
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH LEPORE, CHERYL HOOTEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
