Cases 1 - 10 of 342
Maldonado, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2640
Plaintiff:
GUADALUPE ESCALERA MALDONADO and OMAR MARTINEZ IBARRA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Jayed, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2596
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM KADHIM JAYED and YURISELY IZAZAGA MALDONADO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Maldonado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2396
Petitioner:
JAVIER MALDONADO, VICENTA PERLERA SOLA and DAVID MALDONADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maldonado Reyes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1503
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MANBERTO MALDONADO REYES and MARTA MARIA MALDONADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Valladares-Maldonado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-972
Petitioner:
IVAN OSWALDO VALLADARES-MALDONADO, GRISELDA MENDEZ-PALACIOS, JOSE IVAN VALLADARES-MENDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tellez Camacho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-705
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO TELLEZ CAMACHO, THALIA TELLEZ CONTRERAS, OCTAVIO TELLEZ CONTRERAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maldonado v. Robles Cha
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Marina Maldonado
Defendant:
Victor Manuel Robles Cha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez Campaneros, et al. v. Garland
as 24-391
Petitioner:
JELER SANCHEZ CAMPANEROS, JOSE MORALES SANCHEZ and CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aetna Life Insurance Company et al v. Nathan Samuel Young et al
as 2:2023cv09654
Plaintiff:
AETNA Life Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Aetna Health of California, Inc., a California corporation, Aetna Life Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Nathan Samuel Young, David Young, Jose Ricardo Toscano Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
