Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Ainsworth v. Macias, et al.
as 24-3742
Plaintiff:
TYRELL AINSWORTH
Defendant:
T. MACIAS, individual, GRAY, individual, MCGOWAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. McGowan
as 23-2921
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYCE WILLIAM MCGOWAN
McGowan v. NetApp, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Neil McGowan
Defendant:
NetApp, Inc., Henri Richard, Elizabeth O'Callahan and others
Monical v. Marion County Jail, et al.
as 23-1506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY W. MONICAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, JASON MYERS, MARION COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER and others
Ryan McGowan v. A-List Marketing Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01134
Plaintiff:
Ryan McGowan
Defendant:
A-List Marketing Solutions Inc. doing business as Safeguard Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Martin Ivie v. Travis Adams, et al
as 20-36046
Defendant / Appellee:
J. GARDNER, Detective, C. J. MAXE, MARTY HAYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN STANLEY IVIE
Martin Ivie v. Travis Adams, et al
as 20-35689
Defendant / Appellee:
J. GARDNER, Detective, C. J. MAXE, MARTY HAYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN STANLEY IVIE
Rose McGowan v. Harvey Weinstein et al
as 2:2019cv09105
Defendant:
Boies Schiller Flexner, LLP, The Bloom Firm, David Boies and others
Plaintiff:
Rose McGowan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benny Gibson v. Christine McGowan, et al
as 19-16586
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE MCGOWAN, Detective, Phoenix Police Department, GREG MCKAY, #6156, Police Detective, Phoenix Police Department, JOSHUA CHAMPION, #6600, Police Detective, Phoenix Police Department and others
Defendant:
KENDALL GOO, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENNY DAVID GIBSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
