Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Michael Koby, et al v. ARS National Services, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-56964
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL P. KOBY, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL SIMMONS, an individiual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JONATHAN SUPLER, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: BERNADETTE M. HELMUTH
Defendant - Appellee: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive
Michael Koby, et al v. ARS National Services, Inc., et al
as 10-80234
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHAEL P. KOBY, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL SIMMONS, an individiual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JONATHAN SUPLER, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive
Michael Koby, et al v. ARS National Services, Inc., et al
as 10-80158
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHAEL P. KOBY, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL SIMMONS, an individiual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JONATHAN SUPLER, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive
Koby et al v. ARS National Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00780
Plaintiff: Michael P Koby, Michael Simmons and Jonathan W Supler
Defendant: ARS National Services, Inc. and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?