Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Motorola Inc. v. Pick
as 2:2014ms00071
Defendant: C. Donnelly Communications, Inc., Covert Services, Inc., Todd Davis and others
Plaintiff: Motorola Inc.
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility, et al
as 14-35393
Defendant / Appellant: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and MOTOROLA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: SAS INSTITUTE INC., SIERRA WIRELESS, INC., INTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
Groussman v. Motorola, Inc. Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011mc80307
Plaintiff: Joe M. Groussman
Defendant: Motorola, Inc.
3rd_party_defendant: Padmasree Warrior
Motorola, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 11-80128
Plaintiff - Respondent: MOTOROLA, INC.
Defendant - Petitioner: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
: In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent: USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Wi-Lan Inc. v. Research in Motion Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00859
Plaintiff: Wi-Lan Inc.
Defendant: Research in Motion Corporation, Research in Motion Ltd., Motorola, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: Qualcomm, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bender v. Motorola, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01245
Plaintiff: Gregory Bender
Defendant: Motorola, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05840
Plaintiff: Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc. and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?