Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff: MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor: WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Paz Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2594
Petitioner: EVER GEOVANY PAZ RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paz-Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2174
Petitioner: JORGE AUGUSTO PAZ-ROSALES and JOSE AUGUSTO PAZ-CASTANON
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paz-Galindo v. Garland
as 24-1534
Petitioner: FERNANDO PAZ-GALINDO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasquez Murcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1250
Petitioner: CRISTIAN NAHUM VELASQUEZ MURCIA, TANIA ESTELA PAZ RIVERA and DANIELA NAZARET VELASQUEZ PAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Oropeza-Paz v. Garland
as 24-980
Petitioner: EVER OROPEZA-PAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Macario Paz v. Garland
as 24-55
Petitioner: MYNOR MAURICIO MACARIO PAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant: ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Bautista-Paz v. Garland
as 23-3938
Petitioner: RUBEN BAUTISTA-PAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?